NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 272 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3072 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2460 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| TDP | 115W | 230W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,309 | 2,427 |
| Best Price | $299 | $479 |
| Value Score | 61/100 | 38/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT: Which Should You Buy?
The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is 20% faster at 1440p ultra (73.4 fps against 61.2 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 60% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ($479 against $299) to get 20% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT carries 12GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 draws 115W less (115W versus 230W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is 2 years newer (2023 versus 2021), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.