NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | Radeon RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 384 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2581 MHz |
| TDP | 165W | 230W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 2,427 |
| Best Price | $499 | $479 |
| Value Score | 46/100 | 38/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is faster but costs more. The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT: Which Should You Buy?
These two land on top of each other: 75.7 fps versus 73.4 fps at 1440p ultra, a 3% difference you will not notice in a game. The decision comes down to price, VRAM and power draw rather than speed.
Prices are within 4% of each other ($499 and $479), so the faster card is the obvious pick unless a spec below rules it out for your build.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB carries 16GB against 12GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 12GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 65W less (165W versus 230W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 2 years newer (2023 versus 2021), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.