Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc A770
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A750 | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 560 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3584 | 4096 |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 225W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Generation 12.7 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,607 | 2,974 |
| Best Price | $200 | $329 |
| Value Score | 81/100 | 55/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc A770 is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc A750 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A750 vs Intel Arc A770: Which Should You Buy?
The Intel Arc A770 is 11% faster at 1440p ultra (59.8 fps against 53.7 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 65% premium for the Intel Arc A770 ($329 against $200) to get 11% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc A750 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc A770 carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly.