Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A750 | GeForce RTX 3060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3584 | 3584 |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | 1777 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 170W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Ampere |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,607 | 1,965 |
| Best Price | $200 | $250 |
| Value Score | 81/100 | 54/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc A750 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060: Which Should You Buy?
These two land on top of each other: 54 fps versus 53.7 fps at 1440p ultra, a 1% difference you will not notice in a game. The decision comes down to price, VRAM and power draw rather than speed.
You pay a 25% premium for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 ($250 against $200) to get 1% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc A750 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 carries 12GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 draws 55W less (170W versus 225W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.