NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti | Radeon RX 6750 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 432 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 2560 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2600 MHz |
| TDP | 160W | 250W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 2,540 |
| Best Price | $399 | $549 |
| Value Score | 57/100 | 42/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT: Which Should You Buy?
These two land on top of each other: 77.2 fps versus 75.6 fps at 1440p ultra, a 2% difference you will not notice in a game. The decision comes down to price, VRAM and power draw rather than speed.
You pay a 38% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT ($549 against $399) to get 2% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT carries 12GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti draws 90W less (160W versus 250W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case.