NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | Radeon RX 6900 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 512 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4352 | 5120 |
| Boost Clock | 2535 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| TDP | 165W | 300W |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,919 | 4,065 |
| Best Price | $499 | $999 |
| Value Score | 46/100 | 26/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT delivers 102.1 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB's 75.7 fps, a 35% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 100% premium for the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ($999 against $499) to get 35% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 135W less (165W versus 300W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3 years newer (2023 versus 2020), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.