NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2080 | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Shaders | 2944 | 4352 |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2535 MHz |
| TDP | 215W | 165W |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 1,745 | 2,919 |
| Best Price | $699 | $499 |
| Value Score | 18/100 | 46/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB: Which Should You Buy?
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 20% faster at 1440p ultra (75.7 fps against 63.2 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
Pricing settles it: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is both faster and 40% cheaper at $499 versus $699. There is no scenario in this pairing where the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 is the better buy at these prices.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 50W less (165W versus 215W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 5 years newer (2023 versus 2018), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.