NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce RTX 2070 Super | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Shaders | 2560 | 4352 |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2535 MHz |
| TDP | 215W | 165W |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 1,680 | 2,919 |
| Best Price | $499 | $499 |
| Value Score | 23/100 | 46/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB delivers 75.7 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super's 58.4 fps, a 30% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
Prices are within 0% of each other ($499 and $499), so the faster card is the obvious pick unless a spec below rules it out for your build.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB carries 16GB against 8GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 8GB cards age badly; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB draws 50W less (165W versus 215W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 4 years newer (2023 versus 2019), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.