NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6600
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Radeon RX 6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 6GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 224 GB/s |
| Shaders | 1536 | 1792 |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz | 2491 MHz |
| TDP | 120W | 132W |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 1,052 | 1,489 |
| Best Price | $279 | $219 |
| Value Score | 24/100 | 51/100 |
Verdict
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 is the clear winner — it offers both better performance and better value.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 6600: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The AMD Radeon RX 6600 delivers 44.8 fps at 1440p ultra to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 33.3 fps, a 35% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
Pricing settles it: the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is both faster and 27% cheaper at $219 versus $279. There is no scenario in this pairing where the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the better buy at these prices.
Two things beyond raw speed: the AMD Radeon RX 6600 is 2 years newer (2021 versus 2019), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.