NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | Radeon RX 5600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 11GB GDDR5X | 6GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 484 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Shaders | 3584 | 2304 |
| Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| TDP | 250W | 150W |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 1.0 |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,231 | 1,664 |
| Best Price | $699 | $279 |
| Value Score | 14/100 | 38/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is faster but costs more. The AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti vs AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT: Which Should You Buy?
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is 20% faster at 1440p ultra (50.2 fps against 42 fps). That is roughly one settings notch — enough to matter if you are chasing a specific refresh rate, not enough to rescue a bad price.
You pay a 151% premium for the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti ($699 against $279) to get 20% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti carries 11GB against 6GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 6GB cards age badly; and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT draws 100W less (150W versus 250W), which can mean a smaller PSU and a quieter case; and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT is 3 years newer (2020 versus 2017), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.