Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
Gaming figures are average frames per second, measured by Tom's Hardware GPU hierarchy. Geometric mean of 15 games, ultra settings, no upscaling. Ray tracing figures are DXR-enabled at 1440p. A dash means the card was not tested at that resolution. Productivity and Steel Nomad are synthetic scores on their own scales and are not comparable to the fps columns.
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A770 | GeForce RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 16GB GDDR6 | 11GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 560 GB/s | 616 GB/s |
| Shaders | 4096 | 4352 |
| Boost Clock | 2400 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| TDP | 225W | 250W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,974 | 3,524 |
| Best Price | $329 | $999 |
| Value Score | 55/100 | 15/100 |
Verdict
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti is faster but costs more. The Intel Arc A770 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A770 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti: Which Should You Buy?
This is not a close race. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti delivers 75.6 fps at 1440p ultra to the Intel Arc A770's 59.8 fps, a 26% gap. Only pick the slower card if it is dramatically cheaper or you need it for a lower resolution.
You pay a 204% premium for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ($999 against $329) to get 26% more frames. The extra frames do not keep up with the extra cost — the Intel Arc A770 is the better value here.
Two things beyond raw speed: Intel Arc A770 carries 16GB against 11GB — the deciding factor at 1440p and above with ray tracing or texture packs, and the reason 11GB cards age badly; and the Intel Arc A770 is 4 years newer (2022 versus 2018), so it gets longer driver support and newer upscaling and frame generation features.