Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
Side-by-side benchmark comparison, specs, pricing, and value analysis.
Benchmark Comparison
🖥️ 1080p GamingArc A750 +30%
7457
🎮 1440p GamingArc A750 +6%
5653
📺 4K GamingArc A750 +3%
3534
💡 Ray TracingArc A750 +17%
2824
⚡ ProductivityArc A750 +6%
5350
Specifications
| Spec | Arc A750 | GeForce GTX 1650 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 8GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 512 GB/s | — |
| Shaders | 3584 | — |
| Boost Clock | 2350 MHz | — |
| TDP | 225W | 75W |
| Architecture | Generation 12.7 | Turing |
| 3DMark Steel Nomad | 2,607 | 269 |
| Best Price | $200 | $149 |
| Value Score | 50/100 | 43/100 |
Verdict
The Intel Arc A750 is faster but costs more. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 offers better value for money. Your choice depends on budget vs. performance priority.
Intel Arc A750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650: Which Should You Buy?
The Intel Arc A750 features 8GB of GDDR6 memory built on the Generation 12.7 architecture, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 comes with 8GB GDDR6 on Turing. In 1440p gaming benchmarks, the Intel Arc A750 leads by 6%.
At current prices ($200 vs $149), the Intel Arc A750 offers better value with a score of 50/100 compared to 43/100. Power consumption also differs: 225W vs 75W TDP.